“The Case Against Vaccines: A to Z!”
by T. Matthew Phillips, Esq.
(A) In America, if your child dies in an SUV rollover, you can sue Ford or Chevy; however, if your child dies in a vaccine rollover, you cannot sue Merck or Pfizer. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 forbids parents of vaccine-injured children from suing vaccine makers at the county courthouse; instead, vaccine-injured families must file claims in the vaccine court, (essentially, a “kangaroo court”), in Washington D.C., where families have no right to “trial by jury” (a constitutional right guaranteed by the 7th Amendment). Congress forbids traditional personal injury lawsuits against vaccines makers because, if allowed to sue, personal injury attorneys would quickly bankrupt and wipe-out the entire industry. In the history of the world, no other industry has ever enjoyed blanket immunity from getting sued—for selling products legally presumed to be “unavoidably unsafe” and “unavoidably defective”—and known to indiscriminately kill and injure. When it comes to pharmaceutical drugs, the risk of adverse side-effects are generally possible, but with vaccines, there’s a heightened risk of adverse side-effects, and federal law presumes this risk is inherent and unavoidable. NOTE: The fact that you cannot sue vaccine makers should be a flashing, red neon sign! If vaccines were truly “safe ‘n effective”—then vaccine makers wouldn’t need Congress to immunize them from products liability lawsuits. It’s that simple.
(B) Under American law, curious as it sounds, it is legally impossible to design a defective vaccine—because American courts are forbidden to litigate products liability cases involving vaccines. In 2011, the Supreme Court declared that all vaccine designs are unavoidably defective, and further, that all vaccines necessarily come with “unavoidable adverse side effects”—presumptively caused by defective design. The Supreme Court held that, even where vaccines are free of “manufacturing” defects, they are nevertheless presumed to come with an inherent risk of “unavoidable adverse side effects”—presumptively caused by defective vaccine design. The Court ruled: (1) that “design defects” presumptively cause all vaccine injuries and deaths; and (2) that “design defects” are unavoidable, along with the resulting harm. In plain English, all vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe” precisely because they are “unavoidably defective.” [Bruesewitz vs. Wyeth LLC, (2011) 562 U.S. 223]
(C) Since 1986, when Congress immunized vaccine makers from lawsuits, the federal gov’t has paid-out over $4 billion (taxpayer dollars) to compensate vaccine-injured families. But note, these vaccine court payouts are based on a “no-fault” system with wrongful death claims limited to $250,000 (and this sum has never been adjusted for inflation in over thirty years!) If this $4 billion dollar sum were assessed at “market rate”—at the Los Angeles County Courthouse in downtown L.A.—the vaccine injury payouts would easily multiply tenfold, i.e., upwards of $40 billion in vaccine injury and death payouts, which means that vaccines are the most injurious consumer product ever devised by mankind. Since becoming “immune” to litigation in 1986, when vaccine makers hit pay dirt and the vaccine gold rush began. In the last 30 years, vaccine production has skyrocketed. In the 1960s, kindergartners were required to get six (6) vaccines; today, they are required to get seventy-two (72). Nowadays, governments the world over enact compulsory vaccination laws—and this translates to compulsory profits for the vaccine industry. Vaccine makers enjoy the highest form of protectionism, i.e., the government protects them from lawsuits; and, to make matters worse, the government mandates those vaccine products—knowing full well that the people have no legal recourse when defective vaccines kill and disable. Hypothetical: Suppose one’s last name were Nike, owner of a shoe-making business; suppose also that Sacramento lawmakers enact a law mandating that all California children must wear Nike shoes as a legal requirement to attend school; suppose further that all shoes, including Nike shoes, are legally presumed to come with an unavoidable risk of defective shoe design—which presumptively causes children to “slip and fall,” which results in death and disability; suppose further still, that federal law expressly forbids “slip ‘n fall” lawsuits, which allege defective shoe design, as against shoemakers. This hypothetical precisely illustrates the sweetheart deal that the national vaccine market now enjoys. To bully children into getting vaccinated, the state holds hostage the child’s education; parents are coerced into offering-up their children on the deathly altar of inoculation—or else forfeit their child’s education.
(D) Because parents of vaccine-injured children cannot sue vaccine makers, there is no incentive to make safe vaccines; but even if there were some incentive, there’s no such thing as “safe” vaccines in the first place, and no such thing as “safer” vaccines. And, because federal law forbids design defect lawsuits against vaccine makers, there is no legal mechanism by which to subpoena industry documents that might aid in understanding the science of vaccine injuries. In short, with no possibility of design defect lawsuits alleging vaccine injuries, the science of understanding vaccine injuries has ground to a complete standstill.
(E) No vaccine comes with an immunization “warranty” of any kind. Vaccine makers make no guarantees that their products will actually confer immunity—because vaccine makers have no way of knowing how any given vaccine will affect any given individual. Parents doing a simple “risk/benefit” analysis must consider that no vaccine comes with the promise of even one single “benefit,” while all vaccines come with guaranteed “risk” of unavoidable design defects—inherent in all vaccine designs—which presumptively causes unavoidable adverse side effects—including death and disability.
(F) In 2011, the Supreme Court noted: “The FDA has never even spelled out in regulations the criteria it uses to decide whether a vaccine is safe and effective for its intended use,” [Bruesewitz vs. Wyeth LLC, (2011) 562 U.S. 223]. Lots of gov’t agencies talk about “safe” vaccines, but no gov’t agency is willing to define the term “safe” as it relates to vaccines. How many human test subjects must die or become disabled before a new vaccine is deemed “unsafe?” What is the highest percentage of test subjects that a given vaccine can kill or disable—and still achieve a “safe” rating?
(G) Many children receive multiple vaccinations in a single well-visit, however, no vaccine is ever safety-tested in combination with other vaccines (or pharmaceuticals) to determine their combined effects. Furthermore, no long-term safety study compares vaccinated versus non-vaccinated groups. But more importantly, no vaccine is ever tested for “clinical efficacy,” i.e., to see whether they actually work—by using pathogens to challenge the immune systems of the recently-vaccinated, as well as the long-ago vaccinated—in order to determine whether they are able to actually fight-off pathogenic invasions.
(H) Vaccines are tested only for “immunogenicity,” i.e., their ability to provoke an immune defense response. However, vaccines are never tested for “clinical efficacy,” i.e., their ability to actually confer immunity. And here lay the underpinnings of the vaccine hoax—medical science pretends that “vaccine-induced immune defense response equals immunity,” but this is flatly false. The fact that a person may produce antibodies following vaccination is NOT an indicator that his or her immune system has acquired future disease-fighting abilities; rather, the fact of antibody production is merely a sign of infection—and nothing more. NOTE: if done properly, testing for “clinical efficacy” would consist of vaccinating a control group—e.g., 10,000 children would receive an MMR shot, (measles, mumps, rubella), at 1 year of age, and a follow-up MMR at 5 years—and then, when the test subjects reach a certain age, (e.g., 13 years old), scientists would then challenge their immune systems with the three pathogens, (i.e., measles, mumps, and rubella viruses)—to determine whether the subjects’ immune systems can actually vanquish the three viruses. But this type of real-world testing never happens in the real world; in the real world, they test these pathogens on mice. However, some viruses—like measles, mumps, and rubella—are not pathogenic to mice, and therefore, it’s pointless (if not cruel) to test these pathogens on mice, which are impervious to the pathogens, but nevertheless vulnerable to the adjuvants, preservatives, and heavy metals (just like we are!). NOTE: when shot-up with only the measles pathogen, a mouse’s immune system activates no response; however, when the measles pathogen is combined with adjuvants, preservatives, and heavy metals, there will most certainly be an immune defense response. When shot-up, the mouse’s immune system senses infection—not from the pathogens, but from the adjuvants, preservatives, and heavy metals—and this toxic exposure activates immune defense responses, which scientists conveniently misinterpret as a sign of future disease-fighting abilities (which, they argue, is supposedly achieved by mere exposure to the pathogens). And then the testing ceases. They stop testing at the first sign of immune defense response and then make the rote conclusion that “immunity is achieved.” But it’s all a charade. Vaccine makers cease the testing process at “immunogenicity”—and never go on to test for “clinical efficacy”—for one obvious reason, i.e., none of the test subjects would ever withstand real-world pathogenic challenges; no indeed, they’d all come down with full-blown cases of the various diseases with which they’re challenged.
(I) Vaccine ingredients kill gut flora—i.e., intestinal microbes that regulate our digestion, metabolism, and immune system function. Vaccine-induced microbial die-off hinders our ability to digest food, metabolize nutrients, burn calories, and activate immune defense responses. (And this microbial die-off is evidenced by diarrhea, the likes of which often accompanies antibiotic use.) Notably, obesity is a common symptom of over-vaccination because vaccine ingredients, (along with pesticides and antibiotics), kill gut microbes responsible for burning calories; and when these calorie-burning microbes die-off, the body simply becomes unable to burn as many calories as it intakes—and obesity predictably then results. But perhaps most significantly, all vaccines induce this microbial die-off, which debilitates the immune system—and defeats the body’s ability to activate immune defense responses—which is the exact opposite of what vaccines are touted to do.
(J) Certain vaccine ingredients, particularly aluminum, mercury, and formaldehyde, tend to erode, (demyelinate), the protective coating, (myelin sheath), which insulates nerves, and this erosion causes nerve damage, which in turn impedes and obstructs the nervous system’s ability to send and receive electrical impulses to and from the brain—and this impairs cognitive ability, degenerates motor function, and all too often results in paralysis and autism. Neurotoxin overload is the direct cause of autism spectrum disorder.
(K) Medical science provides no criteria to predict whether a particular person can be successfully immunized with a particular vaccine—and no criteria to predict whether a particular person is susceptible to injuries from a particular vaccine. And, of course, for those who receive an annual flu shot—and remain healthy during flu season—there’s no way for them to know for sure whether their flu shot was the cause-in-fact of not getting the flu.
(L) Persons who receive a flu shot often develop a full-blown case of the flu—as a direct result of the flu shot—because, of course, the flu shot injects flu-causing viruses directly into the body, which all too often results in adverse flu events. Of course the flu shot can cause the flu! After all, the whole point of vaccination is to inject pathogens into the body; and thus, it should come as no surprise when those injected pathogens cause full-blown illness. Vaccination is just another way of saying “pathogenesis,” i.e., the origin of disease.
(M) When a person is vaccinated, but immunization fails to take hold, mainstream science is unable to explain why; and even when it supposedly does takes hold, mainstream science remains unable to explain why, nor can it predict how long immunity will supposedly last; and, when vaccines kill and maim, mainstream science is never able to explain why. Nowadays, all vaccine injuries are deemed a “temporal coincidence” unrelated to vaccines, but instead caused by poor family history, i.e., “bad genes.” It’s the same with all vaccine injuries; the child’s genetic defect, by sheer coincidence, just happened to switch-on immediately after vaccination, thereby causing permanent disability or death; however, according to mainstream science, the two events, vaccination and injury—linked only by their close proximity in time—were just a temporal coincidence.
(N) In 2005, a federal appeals court described vaccine science as a “field bereft of complete and direct proof of how vaccines affect the human body,” [Althen vs. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 418 F.3d 1274 (Fed. Cir. 2005)].
(O) Vaccines come in only one “size”—i.e., volume of liquid in the syringe; a 20-pound infant receives the same flu shot dosage as a 200-pound adult.
(P) The “herd immunity theory” provides that the “healthy 95%” must be vaccinated to protect the “unhealthy 5%”—who cannot be vaccinated—presumably because vaccination would kill or maim them. NOTE: we are led to believe that vaccines boost immunity; but if that were true, then vaccines should boost immunity for everybody—but apparently they don’t; according to mainstream science, vaccines strengthen the immune system only for those with already-strong immune systems, (who don’t really need a boost); but when it comes to the most vulnerable, the immuno-compromised, vaccination is considered too dangerous—apparently because vaccination would push their immune system “over the cliff.” Truth is, all vaccines are injurious to everybody’s immune system because vaccines introduce the body to pathogens and toxins which make everybody sick—even if just a little bit—and those little bits of vaccine-induced illness aggregate over time and their injurious effects, while not immediately noticeable in the healthy, are far more pronounced and devastating for the chronically ill, the feeble, the elderly, and infants—whose immune systems are easily pushed “over the cliff” by vaccination. The so-called “herd immunity theory,” of course, is only a theory; and, although it’s the central hypothesis that drives vaccine theory, it has never been proven—and quite easy to disprove because it’s built on a faulty premise. There’s no such thing as “herd immunity” precisely because “the herd” has no collective immune system. Infectious disease happens on an individual basis—not on a group basis. In other words, groups don’t get the measles—individuals do. Any medical theory that advances the notion of groups having collective immune systems is too fanciful to be taken seriously.
(Q) The MMR vaccine, (measles, mumps, and rubella), is not given to infants, (i.e., newborn through 12 months), because medical science considers the MMR “unsafe” for that age group, presumably because vaccination would overwhelm the infant immune system and kill or maim the baby.
(R) Over the past ten years, the number of American children who died from the MMR vaccine, (measles, mumps, and rubella), far outpaces the number who died from all three diseases combined. Vaccine-induced deaths are always misdiagnosed and often mislabeled as the catch-all Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, or “SIDS”—which should be relabeled as Vaccine Induced Death Syndrome, or “VIDS.”
(S) Persons vaccinated for measles, mumps, and rubella can “shed” all three viruses—i.e., infect others—for approx. 28 days after MMR vaccination; simply stated, the recently-vaccinated must be quarantined for at least 28 days—as the MMR inserts plainly recommend. The industry uses the clever term “shedding” as a euphemism to obscure the fact that the recently vaccinated are highly infectious to others. The shedding phenomenon exists with all vaccines and it is the cause in fact of all modern “outbreaks.”
(T) Measles is now a disease of vaccinated persons; in all measles outbreaks, (including Disneyland 2015), fully 90% of those afflicted were already vaccinated for measles—which comes as no surprise because fully 90% of any given populace have already been vaccinated for measles. Perhaps most telling, in all measles outbreaks, the mainstream media never mentions the awkward truth—that 9-out-of-10 persons afflicted were, in fact, victims of “vaccine failure.” Curiously, in reporting outbreaks, the media never discloses the number of victims who were already vaccinated; instead, the media mentions only that the unvaccinated are to blame. In all modern outbreaks, the mainstream media blames only the unvaccinated—never mentioning the simple fact that the already-vaccinated can (and do) infect others and ignite infectious outbreaks. In all modern outbreaks, if they were to trace the source of the infection, they would discover that every “patient zero” was recently vaccinated.
(U) The MMR vaccine contains man-made strains of the measles virus, but these “laboratory” strains provide only limited, fleeting protection (if any); notably, persons vaccinated with “laboratory” measle strains remain forever susceptible to the more robust “wild” strains, as well as other “laboratory” strains of the virus.
(V) If a person develops a case of “wild” measles, (from naturally occurring viral strains), then he or she acquires lifetime immunity to all forms of the measles virus; however, if a person develops a case of “laboratory” measles, (from strains attenuated in vitro), then he or she acquires, at most, only temporary immunity—and only to that particular man-made strain.
Even assuming, for argument’s sake, that antibody production were an indicator of future disease-fighting abilities, then such abilities, even if acquired, would never last more than about a month—because no vaccine on the market produces significant antibody response for more than about a month. NOTE: All Titer testing is a hoax. Titer testing supposedly reveals whether a given individual has immunity to a given disease—by testing blood samples for the presence of antibodies to given pathogen. According to mainstream science, if a measles Titer test reveals measle antibodies, then that individual is considered “immune” to measles. But this is utter nonsense. Why?—because, if an individual’s immune system is actively producing measle antibodies, then that can only mean that the measles virus still lurks in that person’s body — and further, that his or her immune system has been unable to vanquish the virus — i.e., unable to completely rid the body of the measle virus — since the time that virus was first injected.
(X) The concept of “booster” shot is a hoax—you cannot “boost” immunity; there are no degrees of immunization—you either achieve immunity or you don’t. Sure, you can boost your “immune system,” generally speaking—e.g., with black elderberry extract or colloidal silver—however, the concept of “immunity” is a conclusion that a particular pathogen cannot affect you. You are either immune to a given pathogen, or you’re not.
(Y) Mothers naturally immunize babies via the placenta and through breastfeeding and this natural immunity transfer cycle, which is old as humankind, comes with no risk of adverse side effects, and confers natural immunity—for life—to commonplace diseases. NOTE: the only other way to achieve immunity to disease is via the “natural” method, i.e., immunity to a given pathogen may be achieved by contracting that pathogen—and actually getting sick from it—and then (hopefully) becoming immune to it. But apparently, this magical phenomenon doesn’t work with every pathogen. The fact of acquiring immunity to a given disease—after having developed symptoms of that disease—is a quirky phenomenon that works with some viruses, (like measles and smallpox), but not others, (like AIDS or herpes). Remember, mainstream science argues that vaccines confer immunity—merely upon a showing of antibody response; but again, mere antibody response is only a sign of infection and nothing more—and the mere fact of having an infection brings no guarantee of future disease-fighting abilities. THE POINT: in order for the introduction of a given pathogen to actually confer immunity, it is not enough that the immune system produce antibodies; no indeed—the person vaccinated must actually “manifest symptoms” and develop a “full-blown” case of the disease. This point is so significant! If you get a flu shot, but fail to immediately develop flu-like symptoms, then it’s proof positive that your flu shot didn’t work, i.e., did not confer immunity. (Re-read the last sentence!) In theory, a flu shot can confer immunity (to particular viral strains) but only if the person vaccinated actually manifests flu-like symptoms and develops a case of the flu—i.e., with a fever, aches, and chills for a week; but then again, upon reflection, maybe it’s better to decline the flu shot—which comes with toxins, preservatives, and heavy metals, not to mention literally hundreds of known adverse side effects—and instead take your chances on naturally acquiring a fever, aches and chills, and then a lifetime of naturally acquired immunity.
(Z) It is impossible to un-vaccinate. And, sadly, mass vaccination practices tend to interrupt, and regrettably, may forever alter humanity’s natural immunity cycles.
~~T. Matthew Phillips, Esq.
[Dedicated the greatest particle physicist who ever lived, Dr. Nancy L. Swanson, Ph.D., (“It’s not the gluten, it’s the glyphosate!”), author of “The Religion of Science” copyright 2012, by N. Lee Swanson; quote: “Science is as much of a religion as any religion has ever been,” (p. 19).]
Produced and Directed by TMP’s Midnight Minions
in association with Chapter Eleven Productions,
Fly-By-Night Management Services, and
Neurotica Entertainment Group
“Freedom means nothing if you can’t keep
the government out of your body.”
T. Matthew Phillips, Esq.